|
|
|
We Remove Personally Damaging Content from Search Results.
If your name is included in a search engine result, newspaper, video, image or webpage, then GDPR Article 17 gives YOU
the Right to Erasure, also known as the Right to Be Forgotten.
(This is not an absolute right, but is based on effective legal arguments).
the Right to Erasure, also known as the Right to Be Forgotten.
(This is not an absolute right, but is based on effective legal arguments).
Search results about YOU are YOUR PERSONAL DATA.
The Right to be Forgotten allows private individuals to
CLAIM and CONTROL the results that are returned when their
full name is entered into search engines (e.g. Google and Bing).
CLAIM and CONTROL the results that are returned when their
full name is entered into search engines (e.g. Google and Bing).
|
|
|
By effectively arguing for the Right to be Forgotten,
the privacy lawyers at Internet Erasure have enabled over
600 clients, to achieve removal of more than 25,000 articles,
links and images from Google, Bing, Yahoo and DuckDuckGo
If you need a fresh start after
damaging publicity, reach out today,
WE ARE READY TO HELP.
damaging publicity, reach out today,
WE ARE READY TO HELP.
|
|
|
Our service typically includes all of the following 10 Steps
1) Consultation - a pre-qualification process which is free of charge and includes helpful guidance and detailed advice.
2) Onboarding - We only accept clients if we believe that it is in their best interest to instruct us and only if we expect to achieve removal of the damaging content.
3) Research across all platforms to locate all links, shares, images and provision of a comprehensive Adverse Media Report.
4) Pre-submission actions, e.g., strategic grouping of subjects and timelines, delinking of dead links, early removal of "easy-win" content or any content which could be harmful to our main case.
5) Submissions drafted under GDPR Article 17 and made to Google, Bing, Yahoo, and derivative search engines.
6) Evidence obtained and provided to search engine case workers as required, e.g.: witness statements, letters from police evidencing crime, change of industry, evidence of criminal record, sentencing or acquittal etc.
7) Appeals drafted (often containing between nineteen and twenty-five detailed and referenced legal arguments) and submitted to The Information Commissioner, if required.
8) Case reviews and resubmissions until removal of the adverse media from search results is achieved. Including removal of unwanted google autocomplete entries and damaging search suggestions.
9) ‘Sweep and submit’- Our researcher performs deep searches 'sweeping' the search engines as they readjust and then submits any links found to Google and Bing for removal. This ensures that all URL's, .AMP links (accelerated mobile pages) and thumbnail images (stored on Google servers) are caught and removed.
10) A full year of support in case any further links or images are unearthed or shared and later appear in search results.
2) Onboarding - We only accept clients if we believe that it is in their best interest to instruct us and only if we expect to achieve removal of the damaging content.
3) Research across all platforms to locate all links, shares, images and provision of a comprehensive Adverse Media Report.
4) Pre-submission actions, e.g., strategic grouping of subjects and timelines, delinking of dead links, early removal of "easy-win" content or any content which could be harmful to our main case.
5) Submissions drafted under GDPR Article 17 and made to Google, Bing, Yahoo, and derivative search engines.
6) Evidence obtained and provided to search engine case workers as required, e.g.: witness statements, letters from police evidencing crime, change of industry, evidence of criminal record, sentencing or acquittal etc.
7) Appeals drafted (often containing between nineteen and twenty-five detailed and referenced legal arguments) and submitted to The Information Commissioner, if required.
8) Case reviews and resubmissions until removal of the adverse media from search results is achieved. Including removal of unwanted google autocomplete entries and damaging search suggestions.
9) ‘Sweep and submit’- Our researcher performs deep searches 'sweeping' the search engines as they readjust and then submits any links found to Google and Bing for removal. This ensures that all URL's, .AMP links (accelerated mobile pages) and thumbnail images (stored on Google servers) are caught and removed.
10) A full year of support in case any further links or images are unearthed or shared and later appear in search results.
|
|
|
What about Direct and Permanent Deletions and Take Downs?
,,,
Using the Right to be Forgotten (also known as Right to Erasure), as well as defamation, copyright, safeguarding, harassment and privacy arguments, we have achieved the PERMANENT DELETION, or anonymisation, of damaging content from numerous websites including:
192.com,
About.me,
Accounting Web,
Archive,
Ancestry,
Architects Journal,
Artemis,
Asdeporte,
Baroness-j,
Beer Money Forum,
Behance,
Birmingham Mail,
BizDB,
Bizstats,
Bognor Regis Observer,
Bridging and Commercial,
Caseboard,
Casemine,
CBetta,
Celebsagewiki,
Cengage,
ChamberMK.co.uk
Change.org,
Churchgates,
Company Check,
CompanyDirectorCheck,
Company-Director-Search,
CompaniesList,
Comparably,
Court News UK,
Croydon.gov.uk,
Crowd Funder,
Cylex,
Daily Advent,
Daily Sun Express,
Digital Spy,
Driving Lesson .com,
Dun & Bradstreet (DNB.com),
DESIblitz,
e Financial Careers,
EJBC,
E Land Registry,
Endole,
Entertainment Daily,
Express,
Express Digest,
Express and Star,
Facebook,
Falkirk Herald,
Fansmetrics,
Fashion Model Directory,
Fashion Model Secret,
Fitness to Practise News,
Flipboard,
Foundersuite,
Free Court Case,
Gale,
General Optical Council,
Glassdoor,
Gov.uk/government/news,
Graduates.name,
Ground.news,
Head Topics,
Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC),
Health and Safety Matters,
Heat Mag,
Heat world,
Hello magazine,
HMRC Press Releases,
Hope Not Hate,
Horse and Hound,
Hot Lifestyle News,
Houzz,
HSMSearch.com,
Hughes Murphy,
ID Crawl,
Identico,
Idol net worth,
Imgur,
inewsgr,
INKL,
Inside Express,
Insidetime,
Insolvency.gov.uk,
Intelius,
Irish Central,
Isuu,
ITV News,
John O'Groat Journal,
Just Answer,
Knowhere,
Knowledia,
Landlord Today,
LinkedIn,
Legal Futures,
Local Crime News,
Locate Family,
Mail Online,
Male Model Scene,
Medium,
Mirror,
Models.com,
Mumsnet,
MyLondon.news,
MySpace,
Naked Salary,
Nestia,
Newspapers.com,
Newstral,
Newslocker,
NERSOU - North East Regional Special Operations Unit,
Northants-Chamber.co.uk,
Nottinghamshire Police,
NY Daily News,
Open University Law School,
Optimum Advocates,
Owners Properties Direct,
Oxford Mail,
Oxford.gov.uk,
People per hour,
Planet Radio,
Project Casting,
QEB Hollis Whiteman,
Reality Tit Bit,
Reddit,
Reinsurancene,
Research Gate,
Revonect,
RocketReach
RollOnFriday,
Rssing,
Scribd,
Sammy boy forum,
Slideshare,
SOS - Sound on Sound,
Spalding Voice,
Star Now,
Straits Times,
Taxi-driver.co.uk,
TES,
Thames Valley Police,
The Bar Tribunals and Adjudication Service,
The Boar,
The Gazette,
The Daily Mail,
The Daily Mirror,
The FA,
The Free Library,
The Free Dictionary,
The Handbook,
The Insider,
The Institution of Engineering and Technology,
The Irish News,
The London Economic,
The Nursing and Midwifery Council,
The Sun,
The Scottish Sun,
The Student Lawyer,
The Tab,
The Trade Finder,
Third Sector,
ThisisOxfordshire,
Times NG,
TikTok,
Travel Weekly,
Tribune Times,
Twitter,
Vigour Times,
Wealth-X,
Wordsense,
UK Bride,
UKPhoneBook,
UK News Media,
Vine archive,
VLex,
Weebly,
WhatsNew2day,
Wikipedia,
Wired-Gov,
Wordpress,
Yahoo News,
Yorkshire Post,
YouTube,
Zoopla
and many more.
All cases are different and each must be considered on its own merits.
We have also removed Autocomplete entries, knowledge bars and search suggestions from Google saving many clients from huge and disproportionate impacts on their daily lives.
Using the Right to be Forgotten (also known as Right to Erasure), as well as defamation, copyright, safeguarding, harassment and privacy arguments, we have achieved the PERMANENT DELETION, or anonymisation, of damaging content from numerous websites including:
192.com,
About.me,
Accounting Web,
Archive,
Ancestry,
Architects Journal,
Artemis,
Asdeporte,
Baroness-j,
Beer Money Forum,
Behance,
Birmingham Mail,
BizDB,
Bizstats,
Bognor Regis Observer,
Bridging and Commercial,
Caseboard,
Casemine,
CBetta,
Celebsagewiki,
Cengage,
ChamberMK.co.uk
Change.org,
Churchgates,
Company Check,
CompanyDirectorCheck,
Company-Director-Search,
CompaniesList,
Comparably,
Court News UK,
Croydon.gov.uk,
Crowd Funder,
Cylex,
Daily Advent,
Daily Sun Express,
Digital Spy,
Driving Lesson .com,
Dun & Bradstreet (DNB.com),
DESIblitz,
e Financial Careers,
EJBC,
E Land Registry,
Endole,
Entertainment Daily,
Express,
Express Digest,
Express and Star,
Facebook,
Falkirk Herald,
Fansmetrics,
Fashion Model Directory,
Fashion Model Secret,
Fitness to Practise News,
Flipboard,
Foundersuite,
Free Court Case,
Gale,
General Optical Council,
Glassdoor,
Gov.uk/government/news,
Graduates.name,
Ground.news,
Head Topics,
Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC),
Health and Safety Matters,
Heat Mag,
Heat world,
Hello magazine,
HMRC Press Releases,
Hope Not Hate,
Horse and Hound,
Hot Lifestyle News,
Houzz,
HSMSearch.com,
Hughes Murphy,
ID Crawl,
Identico,
Idol net worth,
Imgur,
inewsgr,
INKL,
Inside Express,
Insidetime,
Insolvency.gov.uk,
Intelius,
Irish Central,
Isuu,
ITV News,
John O'Groat Journal,
Just Answer,
Knowhere,
Knowledia,
Landlord Today,
LinkedIn,
Legal Futures,
Local Crime News,
Locate Family,
Mail Online,
Male Model Scene,
Medium,
Mirror,
Models.com,
Mumsnet,
MyLondon.news,
MySpace,
Naked Salary,
Nestia,
Newspapers.com,
Newstral,
Newslocker,
NERSOU - North East Regional Special Operations Unit,
Northants-Chamber.co.uk,
Nottinghamshire Police,
NY Daily News,
Open University Law School,
Optimum Advocates,
Owners Properties Direct,
Oxford Mail,
Oxford.gov.uk,
People per hour,
Planet Radio,
Project Casting,
QEB Hollis Whiteman,
Reality Tit Bit,
Reddit,
Reinsurancene,
Research Gate,
Revonect,
RocketReach
RollOnFriday,
Rssing,
Scribd,
Sammy boy forum,
Slideshare,
SOS - Sound on Sound,
Spalding Voice,
Star Now,
Straits Times,
Taxi-driver.co.uk,
TES,
Thames Valley Police,
The Bar Tribunals and Adjudication Service,
The Boar,
The Gazette,
The Daily Mail,
The Daily Mirror,
The FA,
The Free Library,
The Free Dictionary,
The Handbook,
The Insider,
The Institution of Engineering and Technology,
The Irish News,
The London Economic,
The Nursing and Midwifery Council,
The Sun,
The Scottish Sun,
The Student Lawyer,
The Tab,
The Trade Finder,
Third Sector,
ThisisOxfordshire,
Times NG,
TikTok,
Travel Weekly,
Tribune Times,
Twitter,
Vigour Times,
Wealth-X,
Wordsense,
UK Bride,
UKPhoneBook,
UK News Media,
Vine archive,
VLex,
Weebly,
WhatsNew2day,
Wikipedia,
Wired-Gov,
Wordpress,
Yahoo News,
Yorkshire Post,
YouTube,
Zoopla
and many more.
All cases are different and each must be considered on its own merits.
We have also removed Autocomplete entries, knowledge bars and search suggestions from Google saving many clients from huge and disproportionate impacts on their daily lives.
Who Qualifies for the Right to be Forgotten?
The Right to be Forgotten can generally be used to remove the following types of content from Google for searches under individual names:
✔ Spent criminal convictions (explained at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/rehabilitation-periods).
✔ People with criminal convictions who received sentences of less than 4 years where the convicted person has successfully completed their licence.
✔ People who have been acquitted or had charges dropped, i.e. evidentially false allegations (we can obtain copy of criminal record if required to evidence this).
✔ Attack websites, e.g. those established for stalking or harassment purposes against a person, or simply to damage their reputation in the eyes of other people.
✔ Company Closures affecting people, where the company was a separate entity from them and where we can evidence that they are now working in a different industry.
✔ Missing persons reports where we can evidence that we are instructed by the actual person named in the report.
✔ Personal information republished e.g. historic CCJ's or bankruptcy, non-government electoral roll websites and company director information sites.
✔ Public Figures whose name are being used to generate traffic to non-consented or unrelated content, e.g. clothing models whose names are used to link to adult content, or business people whose name is used to link to and endorse dubious, unrelated, forex trading platforms.
✔ Unwanted or alarming content which appears in search results because Google's algorithms think it is relevant, but which is not about the person beings searched and doesn't name them e.g. similar crime reports, articles about relatives, offensive blogs about people with similar names etc.
✔ Damaging or Embarrassing publicity, of other various kinds e.g. relationship breakdowns, inheritance disputes or news stories that cause shame, bullying or harassment and regret (even if they were initially consented to).
✔ People with criminal convictions who received sentences of less than 4 years where the convicted person has successfully completed their licence.
✔ People who have been acquitted or had charges dropped, i.e. evidentially false allegations (we can obtain copy of criminal record if required to evidence this).
✔ Attack websites, e.g. those established for stalking or harassment purposes against a person, or simply to damage their reputation in the eyes of other people.
✔ Company Closures affecting people, where the company was a separate entity from them and where we can evidence that they are now working in a different industry.
✔ Missing persons reports where we can evidence that we are instructed by the actual person named in the report.
✔ Personal information republished e.g. historic CCJ's or bankruptcy, non-government electoral roll websites and company director information sites.
✔ Public Figures whose name are being used to generate traffic to non-consented or unrelated content, e.g. clothing models whose names are used to link to adult content, or business people whose name is used to link to and endorse dubious, unrelated, forex trading platforms.
✔ Unwanted or alarming content which appears in search results because Google's algorithms think it is relevant, but which is not about the person beings searched and doesn't name them e.g. similar crime reports, articles about relatives, offensive blogs about people with similar names etc.
✔ Damaging or Embarrassing publicity, of other various kinds e.g. relationship breakdowns, inheritance disputes or news stories that cause shame, bullying or harassment and regret (even if they were initially consented to).
The Following People generally
have NO GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL:
have NO GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL:
✘ Legitimate, fair and referenced expressions of opinion on a business or company.
✘ Recently expressed personal opinions on an individual's current business methods.
✘ Companies House records are not generally removeable (but content from most sites that source and republish data from Companies House is removeable).
✘ Content relating to people who have run for political office or been substantially involved in politics or lobbying, or as religious leaders or journalists, or who have otherwise relinquished privacy rights by intentionally entering the public eye, in the last 10 years.
✘ Undecided or outstanding civil or criminal legal matters, such as coverage of pending civil proceeding or reporting of alleged perpetrators whilst they are awaiting trial or awaiting sentencing (For example, publicity around alleged crimes including “predator hunter” type videos which feature an arrest, are not removeable prior to conviction or acquittal).
✘ Sentences of more than 4 years imprisonment for serious violent, sexual or terrorism offences (Schedule 18).
✘ Sentences of more than 4 years imprisonment for any other crimes, less than 10 years ago (unless sentenced reduced or conviction overturned on appeal).
✘ Convictions for terrorist related offences, even if the sentence was less than 4 years.
✘ Convictions for in-person (physical) sexual crimes, even if the sentence was less than 4 years.
✘ Convictions for in-person (physical) crimes against children of any kind, even if the sentence was less than 4 years.
✘ Recently expressed personal opinions on an individual's current business methods.
✘ Companies House records are not generally removeable (but content from most sites that source and republish data from Companies House is removeable).
✘ Content relating to people who have run for political office or been substantially involved in politics or lobbying, or as religious leaders or journalists, or who have otherwise relinquished privacy rights by intentionally entering the public eye, in the last 10 years.
✘ Undecided or outstanding civil or criminal legal matters, such as coverage of pending civil proceeding or reporting of alleged perpetrators whilst they are awaiting trial or awaiting sentencing (For example, publicity around alleged crimes including “predator hunter” type videos which feature an arrest, are not removeable prior to conviction or acquittal).
✘ Sentences of more than 4 years imprisonment for serious violent, sexual or terrorism offences (Schedule 18).
✘ Sentences of more than 4 years imprisonment for any other crimes, less than 10 years ago (unless sentenced reduced or conviction overturned on appeal).
✘ Convictions for terrorist related offences, even if the sentence was less than 4 years.
✘ Convictions for in-person (physical) sexual crimes, even if the sentence was less than 4 years.
✘ Convictions for in-person (physical) crimes against children of any kind, even if the sentence was less than 4 years.
|
Internet Erasure Ltd are the highest rated (Trustpilot) and most recommended Reputation Management firm in the UK.
There isn't a single law or tech firm who offers the same service as us.
|
Currently advertising at Tesco petrol stations around the UK
|
Be careful of any individual or firm who claims to quote for the same service. We are the only firm whose processes, thoroughness and guarantees are built into our contract. As a client said: "Internet Erasure are in a class of their own; they literally have no competition. This is why I have referred 6 clients so far, all of whom have had their expectations exceeded."
If you need to clean up Google search results,
CONTACT US TODAY.
CONTACT US TODAY.
|
|
|
